|
Peer reviews
Page history
last edited
by PBworks 15 years, 2 months ago
Kevin and Jillian
- I really liked the conversation aspect of it and the back and forth....especially in the final draft.
- It was broken up into nice even paragraphs and was well organized.
- You both have very distinct personalities in your writing and it really brought the conversation together.
- Even in the first draft, when it wasn't labeled, you could still tell the difference in your writing voices.
- The definition aspect of the piece was extremely well executed.
- There is a lot that goes into defining an entire "world" (I've had friends who have played, I understand the complexities). You did a great job of honing in on key terms and aspects of the game and allowed them to develop to the reader.
- I liked that you had 3 or 4 terms you used throughout, then you would almost concentrate on a new term in each part of the conversation.
- It allowed the reader to collect and organize the termonology in their head easily which in turn can make the reading of the piece easier.
A
Dylan Adams
Peer reviews
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.